Life is better on a bike!

Month: October 2012

Letter to the UCI

The International Cycling Union’s (UCI) management committee meets tomorrow. I sent the following letter to the US representative, Mike Plant. Follow this link to find your representative.

Please consider sending a letter.


Mr. Plant,

I am a longtime fan of professional cycling. I suffered through Festina, but became hopeful afterwards that sincere efforts were being made to bring doping under control. When a test was developed for EPO and later the biological passport, I became more confident that the testing procedures were in place to catch anyone doping. Over the last several years, even the most positive cycling fan had become suspicious of many riders and teams competing in the sport. We watched races like the Tour with the underlying question always present: “were they doping”.

Fast forward to now and the recognition by fans that we had no idea how pervasive doping was in the professional ranks. Further, we have no idea how prevalent doping still is. To make matters worse we have cycling’s governing body failing to do its job – police cycling.

I am waiting to see what UCI does before I make the decision whether or not I will continue to participate as a fan in the sport. In my opinion, UCI must remove both the president Pat McQuaid and honorary president Hein Verbruggen. At best, they are inept in overseeing the sport of cycling.

Moreover, equally critical is to remove the promotional aspect of the UCI’s mission. Mr. McQuaid stated on Monday that he saw no problem with accepting “donations”. This must not continue! It is impossible to police and promote the sport within the same entity; it is an inherent conflict of interest.

Please take fans concerns seriously and do what you can to save our sport and reestablish some integrity to it by taking the necessary steps specified above to restore integrity to the UCI.

Sincerely,

What’s ahead for cycling?

In my mind there are two predominate issues occurring in the sport of cycling right now: Lance Armstrong and the future of professional cycling.

The larger population is focused on Armstrong in light of the 1000 pages of testimonies and facts in the USADA report. If you haven’t read the USADA report “Reasoned Decision” including the affidavits and other supporting evidence I encourage you to do so. As we used to say at work, “you can’t make this sh*t up”!

Armstrong fans shake down into two main camps: believers that continue to support him and those that did believe but can’t any longer in light of the mountain of evidence against him. My last post Armstrong’s Doomsday told you which camp I fall in to.  If you read my post Lance Armstrong from February of this year, you’ll know I haven’t been in this camp that long.

My larger concern however is for the sport of professional cycling. As a longtime fan, I want to go back to following the Tour de France and posting about it here, and following the many other races throughout the season. As it stands right now, I’m not sure I can.

As reported in my last post, the International Cycling Union (UCI) was complicit in the doping that occurred in the Armstrong era (including the more recent Armstrong years). Under the current leadership of president Pat McQuaid and “honorary” president Hein Verbruggen that will not change as evidenced in their press conference Monday October 22. At the heart of UCI’s complicity is the dual mission to both promote and police the sport. No agency or individual can both promote and police anything. It is a basic conflict of interest.

The international cycling community is pressing for new leadership within the UCI, most recently former Tour de France champion Greg Lemond in an open letter to McQuaid. At a minimum, the UCI leadership must go and their “conflict of mission” changed.

I hope that the move to clean house at the UCI will continue to build momentum and that McQuaid and Verbruggen will have no choice but to step down. I’ve wondered since they burned Armstrong will Armstrong turn the tables on them – he has enough dirt on them to do so. But then that would require he admit what he’s done and that doesn’t seem to be on the horizon although I don’t believe Armstrong will go down quietly. He’s just figuring out what his best strategy is.

Without the required change within UCI I see more of the same for cycling. We went through this in 1998 with Festina and now again. Both times the powers-that-be told us the sport is clean now and we must move on. Moving on without fixing the glaring deficiencies will just give us more of the same – been there – done that and don’t want to go through it again.

The credibility of cycling is hanging on by a thread – and that’s for those of us that are fans. The general public thinks cycling is a complete and utter joke. Armstrong has done so much damage it’s hard to pick the worst, but the damage to cycling’s credibility particularly in the US is one of the worst of his crimes.

For cycling to be a viable and respected sport, it must have strong anti-doping measures and the policing entity(s) to enforce them. As cycling’s governing body UCI needs to step up and make the necessary changes. Penalties must be tougher when doping occurs and no one gets a pass regardless of how big they are.

I want cycling to move forward, but only with the right players and system in place to ensure a cleaner more fair sport. Otherwise, if I watch cycling it will be with the understanding that what I see isn’t real – sort of like watching professional wrestling.

Come on cycling get your act together while there’s still time.

Armstrong’s Doomsday

Many of us knew what was most likely coming today. The International Cycling Union (UCI) ratified the United States Anti-Doping Agency’s (USADA) sanctions against Lance Armstrong.

No surprise that they took Armstrong’s tainted Tour de France victories away, too much light had been shed on the misconduct of Armstrong and UCI (at least in international cycling community) for them to do otherwise.

UCI president Pat McQuaid and UCI did nothing today to fix the future of professional cycling. It was a good and necessary first step to ratify the sanctions placed on Armstrong by USADA, but there’s much more to do to ensure that something like this (and Festina in the 1990’s) does not happen again. Based on McQuaid’s statements on UCI’s conflicting roles (promotion and governance) and their continued acceptance of "donations" it would appear the UCI is unwilling to take or promote the necessary next steps.

Very disappointing to say the least.

UCI is complicit in the doping culture. UCI aided and abetted doping, in overt and covert ways. Wearing their “cycling promoter” hat they protected Armstrong because he was good for the sport and provided a revenue stream no one wanted to give up. If they had been wearing their “professional cycling governing” hat Armstrong’s cheating and deception would never have gone this far.

Some Armstrong fans say he won fairly because all of the riders doped (they did not, some of the ones that were vocal about not doping paid dearly for it) and that it was an even playing field. It was not an even playing field, far from it. Teams like US Postal, Discovery, Radio Shack-Nissan (and others) with the big bucks to pay for the likes of Michele Ferrari, pay for the doping products, pay for the system of doping, pay for the public relations and legal cover to keep the doping secret, etc. had a definite advantage.

Moreover, Armstrong did a lot worse than doping. His behavior strikes me as that of a criminal and bully. I was a huge fan of his, but can’t be now. I have zero respect for him. More importantly however, a larger more poisonous problem hangs over the future of professional cycling which I love and want to believe in if they get their act together – UCI. I’m so frustrated and disappointed with UCI. McQuaid stated today "UCI doesn’t see the need to separate governance of cycling and promotion of the sport." What a farce! You cannot promote and govern anything, UCI hasn’t and won’t. It’s a basic conflict of interest.

Until that changes nothing changes.

I know we all have a range of thoughts and feelings and mine are still in flux to some degree mainly regarding the future of the sport of professional cycling. Without a doubt I’m pissed and disappointed beyond measure. Not sure what I’ll do regarding professional cycling in the coming year, but to a large extent my involvement as a fan is dependent of what the governing bodies (namely UCI) do about the culture of doping.

Denver by Bike

On a recent vacation to Denver we made the decision to not rent a car until the last couple of days of our trip when we would drive in to the mountains to see the beautiful fall color of the aspen. Otherwise, to see the sights, dine out, shop, etc. we would go by bike, walk or take public transportation.

As it turned out we didn’t need public transportation other than rental bikes from the Denver B-Cycle bike share program. We used the bike share program, with bike stations scattered throughout Denver – 530 bikes total, to meander throughout Denver for the purpose of transportation and recreation. Bikes are a perfect way to discover a new city and that was especially true here.

Denver’s bike network is extensive as the map below shows. (Click on images to make larger).Denver Bike Map Page 1Denver Bike Map Page 2

What I especially like about it is that so much of it is completely separated paved trail, going along either the South Platte River or Cherry Creek.

Cherry Creek trail

According to Denver.org, Denver has over 850 miles of paved off-road trails. 850 miles! Paved!! Then there are hundreds more miles of dirt trails. Nirvana.

We didn’t even scratch the surface of the bike network. Needless to say, we’ll be going back again and again. We actually are considering relocating to Denver in a few years. Denver is a great city and if you tire of that there’s endless adventure in the Rocky Mountains.

I’m getting ahead of myself, back to this trip…

We biked in the neighborhood of 75 miles while we were there and it would have been more, but I got sick so we didn’t. Actually I came down with a sore throat/cold the first full day we were there, but towards the end of our trip I ran a fever, so I gave in and stayed in – for the most part. The weather also turned cold, including a light dusting of snow.

Our first day we explored the neighborhood (Lo-Hi) of our vacation rental (VRBO), had dinner and then walked to the nearest bike station (about a mile from our rental) to check out bikes.

P1040696

 

We rode along the South Platte river trail to the REI flagship store.

P1040525

We visited this store nearly every day we were there. I never made it to the climbing wall.

P1040527

The Denver B-Cycle Trek bikes had front and back lights so riding at dusk and night was doable. I LOVED riding at night. Plus again, most of these rides were off-road paved trails. Nirvana.

P1040526b

The sun set on Denver-Day 1.

The next day I woke up with that nasty sore throat but we headed out (on foot) for coffee and breakfast with the belief coffee can fix anything.

P1040540

I learned yesterday that not all B-cycles are created equal. Created equal maybe, but they don’t stay that way. My 2nd bike last night wouldn’t shift (3 speed internal hub) so I wanted to select a good one. I always checked the tires and bikes before calling out to Mark the number of the bike I wanted. We had bought a $20 week pass from Denver B-Cycles before arriving. The pricing system works like this: with a pass, the first :30 minutes free, up to 1 hour is $1 and every half hour after is $4.

For short trips you typically wouldn’t have to pay anything. On the days like today where we biked almost the whole day we had a few $1 charges because we couldn’t always find a station close in to return and check out again. No biggie, it was still cheap transportation/recreation.

First on the agenda was to check out the South Platte river trail heading south. We didn’t ride very far before riding back toward downtown to take the Cherry Creek trail.

P1040545P1040550

The ride on Cherry Creek south was much more scenic than the South Platte. Cherry Creek trail (see map above) goes through the downtown area and beyond. It was easy to get downtown using the trail and we often did. We rode this trail almost every day, the furthest south we rode was to the Cherry Creek Mall.

P1040546

P1040655

 

P1040640

The first presidential debate occurred while we were there, the above shot is Latimer Square.

We ended up riding to Washington Park (via South Platte trail and city streets/paths).  It was beautiful park and a great place to ride.  Afterwards we rode around the neighborhood and then returned the bike to the Washington Park station and checked out another.

P1040560

P1040572P1040556

 

We returned via bike paths to Cherry Creek and then downtown for beer and lunch. In that order.

P1040620P1040627P1040631P1040628

P1040642P1040668

On other days we rode to the Botanical Gardens, Confluence Park, Cheesman Park and City Park. Plenty of green spaces in Denver. We found Denver drivers to be safe around us without being skittish. You can tell they are used to dealing with cyclists on the roads.

P1040713P1040763

We spent a day in the car in search of the infamous aspen color in the mountains. We drove up to Guanella Pass, Georgetown, Peak to Peak highway and Boulder. The aspen weren’t at their prime, probably a week or two late, but there was still plenty of color and with the wind, we saw the aspen shimmer. I love the mountains.

P1040758P1070257P1070248 (2)P1070264

Unfortunately, after the mountains I got sicker, spiked a high fever and don’t remember much of the last two days of our trip. I do remember that I was sick of being sick so told Mark I was feeling okay, was tired of being cooped up so we took one last ride on those bright red rentals. We rode for a couple of hours and it was cold!

 

P1040786P1040780P1040774P1040795

Bronchitis, but still smiling.  Why? Because I was on a bike having fun!

Biking makes everything better doesn’t it.

I highly recommend Denver for biking, if you go, be sure and get a free Denver Bike map.

Denver Loves Bikes

Came back from my trip to Denver with bronchitis and have been slooowly getting over it.

Pictures and blog post are in the works.

Until then, I thought I would show you an example of how Denver loves their bikes.

Bike love makes the world go (a)round.

Hmmm.. maybe a slogan for loveofbikes.com?!

P1040759signed